Association of Depression and Adherence to Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to oral anticoagulation is essential for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Depression has been associated with decreased adherence to medications in multiple disease states and in AF is further associated with increased risk of stroke. We hypothesized that individuals with depression and AF have decreased adherence to anticoagulation than those without depression. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used administrative claims data to identify individuals with AF initiating anticoagulation with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin between 2013 and 2019. We quantified adherence using proportion of days covered, categorized as limited (proportion of days covered, <80%), adequate (proportion of days covered, ≥80% to <90%), or optimal (proportion of days covered, ≥90%). We related depression to 12-month adherence to anticoagulation in logistic regression models, adjusting for demographics, medical and psychiatric comorbidities, household income, educational attainment, and insurance type. As a secondary analysis, we determined the association of depression to adherence for each DOAC agent. We identified 101 041 individuals (aged 74.5±8.9 years; 50.6% women; 29.5% race or ethnicity other than White, including Asian or Black race and Hispanic ethnicity) who initiated either DOACs or warfarin. The odds of adequate adherence to DOACs was 11% (95% CI, 0.85-0.93), and the odds of optimal adherence was 12% (95% CI, 0.83-0.91) less in individuals with depression than those without. Depression was not associated with adherence to warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: We identified an association between depression and decreased adherence to DOACs but not warfarin in individuals with AF. Recognizing depression in AF may guide interventions to improve anticoagulation adherence and reduce stroke risk.

Assessment of Depression and Adherence to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Importance: Depression is associated with increased risk of primary and secondary cardiovascular events. Medication adherence may play an essential role. Objective: To evaluate the association of depression and 12-month adherence to guideline-directed medical therapies (eg, antiplatelet agents, ß-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors [ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers], and statins) following percutaneous coronary intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included individuals who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019. Data were collected from a large US health claims database and analyzed between February and August 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of days covered (PDC) for classes of guideline-directed medical therapies, with 12-month adherence categorized as adequate (PDC ≥80% to <90%) or optimal (PDC ≥90%). Multivariable-adjusted regression models were used to evaluate the association of depression with adherence; models incorporated demographic characteristics, comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions, depression treatment, and guideline-directed medical therapy treatment adjustment. The hypothesis was that those with depression would have lower odds of either adequate or optimal adherence to agents essential for guideline-directed medical therapy. Results: Of 124 443 individuals (mean [SD] age, 69.3 [10.6] years; 41 430 [33.3%] female sex; 3694 [3.0%] Asian, 12 611 [10.1%] Black, and 12 337 [9.9%] Hispanic individuals) who received percutaneous coronary interventions, 20 711 (16.6%) had a diagnosis of depression. Those with depression were significantly less likely to obtain adequate 12-month adherence to antiplatelets (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85), ß-blockers (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88), and statins (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.93) than those without depression; there was no association between depression and adherence to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00). Those with depression had similarly decreased likelihood of optimal 12-month adherence to antiplatelets, ß-blockers, and statins as well as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients with depression were less likely to achieve adequate or optimal adherence to medications essential to guideline-directed medical therapies following percutaneous coronary intervention compared with those without depression. Recognition of depression may facilitate targeted interventions to address medication adherence and thereby improve secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Natural history, clinical course and predictors of interval time from initial diagnosis to development of subsequent NSCLC brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. During recent years, accompanying dramatic improvements in systemic disease control, NSCLC brain metastases have emerged as an increasingly relevant clinical problem. However, optimal surveillance practices remain poorly defined. This purpose of this study was to further characterize the natural history, clinical course and risk factors associated with earlier development of subsequent NSCLC brain metastases to better inform clinical practice and help guide survivorship care. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all institutional NSCLC brain metastasis cases treated with radiotherapy between 1997 and 2015. Exclusion criteria included presence of brain metastases at initial NSCLC diagnosis and incomplete staging information. Interval time to brain metastases and subsequent survival were characterized using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 105 patients within this cohort, median interval time to development of brain metastases was 16 months. Median interval times were 29, 19, 16 and 13 months for Stage I-IV patients, respectively (P = 0.016). Additional independent predictors for earlier development of NSCLC brain metastases included non-adenocarcinomatous histopathology (HR 3.036, P < 0.001), no prior surgical resection (HR 1.609, P = 0.036) and no prior systemic therapy (HR 3.560, P = 0.004). Median survival following intracranial progression was 16 months. Delayed development of brain metastases was associated with better prognosis (HR 0.970, P < 0.001) but not survival following intracranial disease onset. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our results provide valuable insights into the natural history of NSCLC brain metastases. NSCLC stage, histology, prior surgical resection and prior systemic therapy emerged as independent predictors for interval time to brain metastases.

Single institution validation of a modified graded prognostic assessment of patients with breast cancer brain metastases.

AIM: The number of breast cancer brain metastases is a prognostic clinical variable in the modified graded prognostic assessment (GPA) Index for breast cancer. PATIENTS & METHODS: We retrospectively gathered data from 127 breast cancer patients who underwent radiation therapy for brain metastasis. Patients were stratified by both breast GPA and modified breast GPA scores, and survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: The Kaplan-Meier curve for patients under the breast GPA classification were not significant, but were significant under the modified breast GPA classification. The inclusion of number of brain metastases into the modified breast GPA index improved prognosis, thus validating the use of the modified breast GPA in prognosticating patient outcome.

Breast cancer subtype and stage are prognostic of time from breast cancer diagnosis to brain metastasis development.

Breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with breast cancer risk factors associated with rapid development of BCBM could potentially benefit from early brain metastasis screening. We retrospectively reviewed all BCBM patients treated with brain radiotherapy at our institution from 1997 to 2015. Interval time to BCBM was defined as date of pathologic breast cancer diagnosis to date of radiographic evidence of brain metastasis. Patients were stratified by breast cancer molecular subtype and stage at diagnosis. Kaplan Meier analysis was conducted on time to development of BCBM. Breast cancer risk factors were correlated with time to BCBM on Cox proportion hazard analysis. The study cohort comprised 121 BCBM patients, with median interval time to BCBM of 46 months. Times to BCBM for Her2+/2HR+, Her2+, Her2-/HR+, and triple-negative (TNBC) subtypes were 70, 44, 42, and 28 months respectively (p = 0.002). Time to BCBM for stages I, II, III, and IV were 70, 54, 29, and 24 months, respectively (p = 0.000). BCBM patients were further stratified by both molecular subtype (TNBC vs. non-TNBC) and stage (I, II vs. III, IV). Median times to BCBM for non-TNBC/stage I-II, TNBC/stage I-II, non-TNBC stage III-IV, and TNBC/stage III-IV were 68, 47, 29, and 6 months respectively (p = 0.000). Subtype and stage were associated with shorter time to BCBM on multivariate analysis. Subtype and initial stage are independently correlated with decreased time to development of BCBM. Patients with advanced high stage and triple negative breast cancer develop brain metastases significantly earlier.

Whole-brain Irradiation Field Design: A Comparison of Parotid Dose.

Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) plays an important role in patients with diffusely metastatic intracranial disease. Whether the extent of the radiation field design to C1 or C2 affects parotid dose and risk for developing xerostomia is unknown. The goal of this study is to examine the parotid dose based off of the inferior extent of WBRT field to either C1 or C2. Patients treated with WBRT with either 30 Gy or 37.5 Gy from 2011 to 2014 at a single institution were examined. Parotid dose constraints were compared with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0615 nasopharyngeal carcinoma for a 33-fraction treatment: mean <26 Gy, volume constraint at 20 Gy (V20) < 20 cc, and dose at 50% of the parotid volume (D50) < 30 Gy. Biologically effective dose (BED) conversions with an α/ß of 3 for normal parotid were performed to compare with 10-fraction and 15-fraction treatments of WBRT. The constraints are as follows: mean < BED 32.83 Gy, V15.76 (for 10-fraction WBRT) or V17.35 (for 15-fraction WBRT) < 20 cc, and D50 < BED 39.09 Gy. Nineteen patients treated to C1 and 26 patients treated to C2 were analyzed. Comparing WBRT to C1 with WBRT to C2, the mean left, right, and both parotids' doses were lower when treated to C1. Converting mean dose to BED3, the parotid doses were lower than BED3 constraint of 32.83 Gy: left (30.12 Gy), right (30.69 Gy), and both parotids (30.32 Gy). V20 to combined parotids was lower in patients treated to C1. When accounting for fractionation of WBRT received, the mean corrected V20 volume was less than 20 cc when treating to C1. D50 for C1 was lower than C2 for the left parotid, right parotid, and both parotids. BED3 conversion for the mean D50 of the left, right, and both parotids was less than 39.09 Gy. In conclusion, WBRT to C1 limits parotid dose, and parotid dose constraints are achievable compared with inferior border at C2. A possible mean parotid dose constraint with BED3 should be less than 32.83 Gy.